site stats

Geoffrey gatete v william kyobe

Web3. Geoffrey Gatete & Anor. William Kyobe SCCA No, 7/2005. 4. Re. Pritchard (1963] ALLER 873. 8.4 Time within which to serve Summons and effect of service of expired summons (Time within which to serve, who to serve, consequences of lapse of time, remedy if time for service lapses). 1. Fredrick James Junju & Anor versus Madhivani Group Ltd … WebThe case of Geoffrey Gatete and Angela Maria Nakigonya versus William Kyobe Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2005 is instructive. The judgment of the court was delivered by Mulenga JSC with concurrence of the rest of the panel of Supreme Court Judges.

2 kyobe ssenyange vs naks ltd 1980 hcb 31 3 sekyaya - Course Hero

WebOn 11th February 2014, the Court of Appeal eventually heard Civil Appeal No. 087 of 2010 ex parte. and delivered its Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 087 of 2010 on 26 th February 2014. The Court set. aside the decision of the High Court refusing to set aside the Judgment of the Kiboga Grade 1. Magistrate. WebSep 21, 2007 · This appeal originates from a summary suit instituted in the High Court by William Kyobe, the above named respondent, in which he obtained a consent judgment against GMT Group, a business firm comprising three partners, namely … greenworks customer service phone number https://multiagro.org

Kazibwe v Uganda Post Ltd (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.

Webnamely; Geoffrey Gatete & Another v William Kyobe SCCA No. 07 80 of 2005, Uganda Micro Enterprises Association Ltd & 2 Ors v The Micro Finance Support Centre Ltd, HCMA No. 125 of 2005, Rwabuganda Godfrey v Bitamisi Namuddu, CACA No. 23/ 2009, Kasule v Muhwezi [1992-1993] HCB 212, and Maria Odido v Barclays Bank of Uganda Ltd, HCMA … WebTomson Muhwezi HCCS No. 167 of 1990 reported in [1992-1993] HCB 212 and Geoffrey Gatete & Another v. William Kyobe, Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2005 reported in [2007] HCB Vol. 1. 54. He then submitted that the issue of illegality has been pleaded in this application therefore it should be investigated and proved at the trial. WebO.30 r 7 provides that where a summons is served in the manner provided by rule 3 of this Order upon a person having the control or management of the partnership business, no appearance by him or her shall be necessary unless he or she is a partner of the firm sued. The case of Geoffrey Gatete and Angela Maria Nakigonya versus William Kyobe ... foam tack board

The Republic of Uganda - DocsLib

Category:Kyobe v Gatete and Anor (Miscellaneous Civil Application …

Tags:Geoffrey gatete v william kyobe

Geoffrey gatete v william kyobe

Supreme Court of Uganda decisions Uganda Legal Information …

WebSee also Gatete Decision of 15 July 2011, paras. 7, 10, 11. [8] Cf. Nizeyimana Trial Decision [The Prosecutor v. Ildéphonse Nizeyimana, Case No. ICTR-00-55C-T, Decision on Defence Motion for Variance of Witness Protective Measures and International Cooperation of the Government of Canada, 23 June 2011], paras. 14, 18; The Prosecutor WebOrder V rule 1 states that when a suit has been duly instituted a summons may be issued to the defendant ordering ... This was properly buttressed in the Geoffrey Gatete & another v William Kyobe, Justice Mulega held that there can be no doubt that the desired and intended result of serving summons on the defendant in a civil suit is to make ...

Geoffrey gatete v william kyobe

Did you know?

WebKasozi dhambi v male construction services co 1981. School Uganda Christian University - Mukono; Course Title LAW 211; Uploaded By nkatalynn. Pages 13 Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. WebThis legal provision has been further clarified by the Supreme Court in the case of Geoffrey Gatete and Another v William Kyobe SCCA No.7 of 2005 when it pointed out that in an …

WebKyobe v Gatete and Another ((Misc. Civil Application No. 10 of 2005 )) [2006] UGSC 11 (3 August 2006); Group. Headnote and flynote. Flynote: Civil Procedure ... The application is supported by the affidavit of William Kyobe, the Applicant/Respondent. Mr. Niwandinda Kab Anthony, a law clerk in law firm of Bamwe & Co., Advocates, which represents ... WebAug 3, 2006 · Kyobe v Gatete and Anor (Miscellaneous Civil Application 10 of 2005) [2006] UGSC 11 (03 August 2006); Cite this case [2006] UGSC 11. Short summary: ... The …

WebUganda Online Law Library is your source for legal documents relating to judgments, acts and statutes of Uganda. Subscribe today and gain access to thousands of documents. WebOlwol v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 2005) [2007] UGSC 9 (16 October 2007) 16 October 2007: Apolo Hotel Corporation Ltd v Geoffrey Oryema and Ors (Civil Appeal No. 12 of 2006) [2007] UGSC 68 (21 September 2007) 21 September 2007: Geoffrey Gatete and Anor v William Kyobe (Civil Appeal No. 7 of 2005) [2007] UGSC 7 (21 September 2007) …

WebAccording to KCCA V Kabandize &10 ors CA No. 013/2014, ... (Attorney General) in order to make him aware of the suit as it was held in the case of Geoffrey Gatete and another V William Kyobe SC Civil Application No.7 of 2005.

Web2. David Ssesanga Versus Greenland Bank in Liquidation HCMA No. 406/2010 3. Geoffrey Gatete & Anor. William Kyobe SCCA No, 7/2005 4. Re. Pritchard (1963] ALLER 873. 8.4 Time within which to serve Summons and effect of service of expired summons (Time within which to serve, who to serve, consequences of lapse of time, remedy if time for service … foam take out containerWebAlhajj Abidi v Tropical Africa Bank – on substituted service and service outside the jurisdiction. Geoffrey Gatete & Others v William Kyobe SCCA No. 7/2005 – on effective service. Appeal from a summary suit where the respondent got a consent judgment against a business firm comprising the appellants. greenworks customer service phoneWebOlwol v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 2005) [2007] UGSC 9 (16 October 2007) 16 October 2007: Apolo Hotel Corporation Ltd v Geoffrey Oryema and Ors (Civil Appeal … foam tail finWebGeoffrey Gatete & Anor. William Kyobe SCCA No, 7/2005 4. Re. Pritchard (1963] ALLER 873. 8.4 Time within which to serve Summons and effect of service of expired summons (Time within which to serve, who to serve, consequences of lapse of time, remedy if time for service lapses). 1. Fredrick James Junju & Anor versus Madhivani Group Ltd HCMA No ... foam talent showWebNov 2, 2004 · Geoffrey Gatete and Another vs. William Kyobe Judgment; Case Number; Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 57 of 2004; Subject; 1).Effect of not filing an … foam talent call 2021WebIn such cases, the service is not effective (see Geoffrey Gatete v. William Kyobe [2007] I H.C.B. 54). According to Order 29 rule 2 (a) of The Civil Procedure Rules, where a suit is against a corporation, the summons may be served on the secretary, or on any director or other principal officer of the corporation. From the wording of this ... foam systems incWebSee: Matiasi Kanimba v S. Patel [1973] HCB 185. In the case of David Ssesange v Greenland Bank Ltd (In Liqudiation) Misc. Application No, 406 of 2010 Madrama J. relying on the Supreme Court decision in Geoffrey Gatete and Angela Nakigonya v … greenworks customer support